Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Gil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 20, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 24, 2009, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

*1372Substantial evidence in the record supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant’s failure to take a lunch break constituted disqualifying misconduct. After becoming concerned about claimant’s penchant for leaving work to run personal errands and skipping lunch in an attempt to make up the lost time, her supervisor directed that she take…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ReichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API