Legal Opinion

Hammon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1992No. 17874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

Movant, Robert Hammon, pursuant to a plea bargain, entered pleas of guilty to charges of burglary and stealing. He was sentenced to two concurrent four-year terms in accordance with that plea bargain. Movant was granted an evidentiary hear*277ing upon his Rule 24.035 motion. After entering findings of fact and conclusions of law, the motion court denied the motion. Movant states two points on appeal.

Movant’s first point is that the motion court erred because the evidence established his pleas were “involuntary, unknowing, and unintelligent” because mov-ant’s “counsels advised him that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heintz v. HudkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Bland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Wooten v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sharp v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Hubbard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Holly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Hickman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API