Legal Opinion
Kislak Co., Inc. v. Byham
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 12, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
229 N.J. Super. 163 (1988)
550 A.2d 1291
THE KISLAK COMPANY, INC. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
RICHARD B. BYHAM AND CATHERINE BYHAM, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted May 23, 1988.
Decided December 12, 1988.
Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and HAVEY.
Frederick M. Testa, attorney for appellant (Frederick M. Testa on the brief).
Jack W. Tapper, attorney for respondents and cross-appellants (Jack W. Tapper on the brief).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.
Plaintiff Kislak Company,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Wheatly v. Sook SuhNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Beachcomber Coins, Inc. v. BoskettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Sadler v. YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Stanchak v. CLIFFSIDE PK. LODGE 1527, LOMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bonnco Petrol, Inc. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Tannenbaum & Milask, Inc. v. MazzolaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998