Legal Opinion
Tannenbaum & Milask, Inc. v. Mazzola
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 5, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
RODRIGUEZ, A.A., J.A.D.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether an individual who owns an interest in real property or shares in a closely-held corporation may be held personally responsible for commissions on a listing agreement signed by him although all owners of the property or all shareholders of the corporation do not join in signing the listing agreement. We hold that such an individual may be held responsible for commissions.
*91Plaintiff Tannenbaum & Milask, Inc., a real estate brokerage firm, appeals from a summary judgment which dismissed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Reynolds Offset Co., Inc. v. SummerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- C. B. Snyder Realty Co. v. National Newark & Essex Banking Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- United States Plywood Corp. v. NeidlingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- RA Intile Realty Co. v. RahoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bilodeau v. Webb, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- In Re: Payroll Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Martin v. ChhabraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- C&J COL. REALTY, INC. v. Poughkeepsie Savings BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Pereira v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.