Legal Opinion
Minerals Technologies Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 7, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered November 6, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3) and (7) and denied plaintiffs cross motion for leave to replead pursuant to CPLR 3211 (e), unanimously affirmed, with costs.
In this action for reimbursement of the costs of legal defense pursuant to an agreement between the parties’ subsidiaries, the motion court correctly found that, construing the governing indemnification provision strictly (see Dunham v Weissman, 281 AD2d 220, 222 [2001], lv denied in part and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Lesesne v. LesesneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Dunham v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In Re the Estate of KlinkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodeo Family Enterprises, LLC v. MatteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rodeo Family Enterprises, LLC v. MatteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012