Legal Opinion

Trujillo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided December 6, 2001No. 2047PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRON, J.,

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. has filed preliminary objections to the amended complaint of plaintiff Louis Trujillo. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the court is issuing a contemporaneous order sustaining the objections in part and overruling the objections in part.

BACKGROUND

This action revolves around State Farm’s standard automobile insurance policy, which includes the following “Compensation provision:”

“In addition to the limits of liability, we will pay for an insured any costs listed below resulting from such accident: ...
“(4) Expenses…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Liberty National Fire Insurance Co. v. AkinTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ash v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Dennis Haugh v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. Ash v. Continental Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Haugh v. Allstate Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API