Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Sepheus

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 21, 2012No. 11-P-160Published

1DissentAgnes, J.

“Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”1

The Commonwealth’s case consists of evidence that the defendant had possession of three plastic “twists,” each containing a small rock of “crack” cocaine,2 along with $312 in United States currency, in unknown denominations. Based on this evidence, and conjecture from evidence that is as probative of possession for personal use as it is of possession with intent to distribute, the majority concludes that the judge below was correct…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API