Legal Opinion
Eduardo Ferrer Bolivar v. Herbert L. Pocklington
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 21, 1992No. 91-1657PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Circuit Judge.
Shortly after appellant Eduardo Ferrer Bolivar (“Ferrer”) instituted the present action against appellee Herbert Pockling-ton in March 1990, Pocklington moved to dismiss the complaint, and for the imposition of sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. 1 Ferrer responded with a timely notice of voluntary dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)©. 2 After the district court, on November 1, had endorsed “Granted and so ordered” on the notice of dismissal, Pocklington interposed opposition to a dismissal “without prejudice” and renewed his request for sanctions under…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commercial Space Management Company, Inc. v. The Boeing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Red Carpet Studios Division of Source Advantage, Ltd. v. SaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Thomason v. LehrerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Rivera v. MelendezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.