State v. Green
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
No matter how devotedly the courts strive for perfection, it is bound in some degree to elude them. The perfect trial probably is yet to be held. Therefore, an appeal by an inevitable process of intellectual distillation reduces the points under review to a question of whether the flaws in the record are of sufficient moment to mark the trial as unfair. In the last analysis, the final measure of error in a criminal case should be: Was the defendant afforded, not a perfect but, rather, a fair trial? — for the constitution guarantees no one a perfect trial.
It was 10 minutes before midnight in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Nelson v. MartinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Casteneda-PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- State v. MilesWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.