Legal Opinion

Kutrzeba v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided June 5, 2009No. 07-1098Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE THE APPEAL

BRUCE E. KASOLD, Judge:

Pursuant to U.S. Vet.App. Rules 27 and 42, Appellant and Appellee hereby agree to and move for termination of the captioned appeal. The terms upon which the parties agree this appeal is to be terminated are contained in the attached Stipulated Agreement.

The Court has held that when the Secretary of Veterans Affairs enters into such an agreement, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision giving rise to the appeal is overridden, thereby mooting the case or controversy. Bond v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 376 (1992). See also Kimberly-Clark v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing Co., Inc. And the Procter & Gamble Company, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Stone v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Bond v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  4. Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API