Legal Opinion

Michael Keithley v. Village of South Jacksonville and Steven Helmich

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 9, 2026No. 1:24-cv-01509Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION MICHAEL KEITHLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-1509 ) VILLAGE OF SOUTH ) JACKSONVILLE and ) STEVEN HELMICH, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER AND OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: Before the Court is Plaintiff Michael Keithley’s Rule 702 Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Defendants’ Expert Witness Mark S. Lamb (d/e 41), to which Defendants Village of South Jacksonville and Steven Helmich filed a Response (d/e 43). Plaintiff filed a Reply in Support of his Rule 702 Motion to Bar Mr. Lamb…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Mark A. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. S. Gopalratnam v. ABC Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Leonard Lapsley v. Xtek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API