Legal Opinion
(PC) Valdez v. Pickett
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 5, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00134Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUBEN VALDEZ, No. 2:20-cv-0134 WBS DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 J. PICKETT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983
and 18 has twice requested authority pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915
to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF 19 Nos. 1, 2, 8). Plaintiff has also filed an unsolicited first amended complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 20 5). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.