Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Ayala

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 9, 1992No. 14379Published

1DissentBerdon, J.

Today, the majority ignores the plain language of our state constitution, which provides that every person who is charged with a crime is entitled “to be released on bail upon sufficient security, except in capital offenses, where the proof is evident or the presumption great . . . .” Conn. Const., art. I, § 8. I disagree with the majority on how it reaches the merits of the issue and also on its interpretation of our state charter of liberty.

I

I do not believe that the chief justice is required to invoke General Statutes § 52-265a1 to hear the present appeal from the Appellate Court’s denial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Laurel Park, Inc. v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API