State v. Ayala
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentBerdon, J.
Today, the majority ignores the plain language of our state constitution, which provides that every person who is charged with a crime is entitled “to be released on bail upon sufficient security, except in capital offenses, where the proof is evident or the presumption great . . . .” Conn. Const., art. I, § 8. I disagree with the majority on how it reaches the merits of the issue and also on its interpretation of our state charter of liberty.
I
I do not believe that the chief justice is required to invoke General Statutes § 52-265a1 to hear the present appeal from the Appellate Court’s denial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Laurel Park, Inc. v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.