Legal Opinion

State v. Gil

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 7, 2011No. 3D10-150PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

The State of Florida appeals the trial court’s order dismissing the information charging Pedro Gil (“the defendant”) with unlawfully driving a motor vehicle while his driver’s license is revoked as a habitual traffic offender pursuant to section 322.34(5), Florida Statutes (2009), based on double jeopardy grounds. Because we agree with the Fourth District Court’s decision in State v. Cooke, 767 So.2d 468 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), that convictions for violation of sections 322.34(2) and (5) do not constitute double jeopardy, and for the reasons stated herein, we reverse.

The defendant was arrested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Valdes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. State v. CookeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gil v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API