Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Francisco Miguel Urrea

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2018No. CR-17-0261-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE BOLICK, opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 During a trial on narcotics charges, the prosecutor violated Defendant's equal protection rights by using peremptory strikes to remove Hispanic jurors from the venire in violation of Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). We hold that the trial court's remedy reinstating the wrongfully excluded jurors to the venire was proper.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Defendant Francisco Miguel Urrea was charged with and found guilty of transportation of a narcotic drug for sale. During jury selection, Urrea raised a Batson…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API