State of Arizona v. Francisco Miguel Urrea
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE BOLICK, opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 During a trial on narcotics charges, the prosecutor violated Defendant's equal protection rights by using peremptory strikes to remove Hispanic jurors from the venire in violation of Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). We hold that the trial court's remedy reinstating the wrongfully excluded jurors to the venire was proper.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Defendant Francisco Miguel Urrea was charged with and found guilty of transportation of a narcotic drug for sale. During jury selection, Urrea raised a Batson…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.