Legal Opinion

Matter of Schenk

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1993No. 49S00-9208-DI-625PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Respondent, Kenneth A. Schenk, has been charged by the Disciplinary Commission of this Court with engaging in Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice in violation of Rule 8.4(d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. In accordance with Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 28(11)(d), the parties have tendered for approval a Statement of Cireumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline. We accept and approve this agreement.

As set forth in the tendered agreement, the Respondent is an attorney subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court. On June 6, 1991, he was…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re DanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API