Humane Society of the United States v. Bush
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARZILAY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This action arises in response to Plaintiffs’ Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society International, and Defenders of Wildlife (“Humane Society”) Application for Fees and Other Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“Pis. ’ Application”). Humane Society asks for fees and other expenses in connection with count three of its action in Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton, 23 CIT -, 44 F.Supp.2d 260 (1999) (“Humane III”). Defendants (“Government”) oppose Pis.’ Application, and claim that their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- James Doty and Susan Doty v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Former Employees of Tyco Electronics, Fiber Optics Division v. United States Department of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Former Employees of Tyco Electronics, Fiber Optics Div. v. US Dept. of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004