Legal Opinion

Humane Society of the United States v. Bush

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 23, 2001No. Slip Op. 01-89; Court 98-03-00557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARZILAY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This action arises in response to Plaintiffs’ Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society International, and Defenders of Wildlife (“Humane Society”) Application for Fees and Other Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“Pis. ’ Application”). Humane Society asks for fees and other expenses in connection with count three of its action in Humane Society of the United States v. Clinton, 23 CIT -, 44 F.Supp.2d 260 (1999) (“Humane III”). Defendants (“Government”) oppose Pis.’ Application, and claim that their…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. James Doty and Susan Doty v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Former Employees of Tyco Electronics, Fiber Optics Division v. United States Department of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  2. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  3. Former Employees of Tyco Electronics, Fiber Optics Div. v. US Dept. of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API