MacOmb County v. AFSCME Council 25 Locals 411 & 893
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentMcCormack, J.
This case concerns the statutory duty to bargain about the calculation of retirement benefits under the public employment relations act (PERA), MCL 423.201 et seq. I agree with the majority that the calculation of retirement benefits is a mandatory subject of collective bargaining, that the calculation of retirement benefits is covered by the *93parties’ collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), and that the term “actuarial equivalent” is unambiguous. Without evidence of a mutually agreed upon intentional practice that modified this unambiguous contract term, I would also agree with the majority…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Detroit Police Officers Association v. DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Gogebic Community College Michigan Educational Support Personnel Ass'n v. Gogebic Community CollegeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001