Legal Opinion

Warren Bros. v. King

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1905No. Nos. 14,628—(47)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis-county, Ensign, J., overruling a general demurrer to the complaint..

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appeal from an order overruling a general demurrer to plaintiff’s, complaint. The complaint alleges, in substance and effect, that defendant had a contract with the city of Duluth to pave certain of its-public streets; that on June 20, 1904, plaintiff, a corporation, entered into a contract with defendant under and by which it agreed to do a part of the work at the compensation of $1.40 per square yard; that plaintiff has at all times since making the contract been ready and willing to perform the same, but the defendant has refused to permit it. to do so and has violated the contract, to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Barteldes Seed Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API