Legal Opinion
People v. Sukram
New York District Court
Decided March 13, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
B. Marc Mogil, J.
This court sua sponte amends by addition its oral decision made from the Bench after a Huntley heáring held January 19, 1989 (People v Huntley, 15 NY2d 72).
The court has considered the issue, tangentially raised, as to whether the State can revoke the driver’s license of a defendant who has (1) refused to submit to a blood test pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194 (1) based on expressed reli*958gious beliefs, and (2) who further may claim in the course of subsequent proceedings now pending that the mandatory revocation of said license and the use of his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Davis v. BeasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. WaltersNew York Family Court · 2010