Legal Opinion

Central Bank v. Kaiperm Santa Clara Federal Credit Union

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1987No. H000863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J.

Nineteen blank money orders were stolen from a branch office of Kaiperm Santa Clara Federal Credit Union (Kaiperm), filled out in varying amounts and subsequently paid by Central Bank (Bank). Bank brought suit against Kaiperm for damages and declaratory relief, claiming that Kaiperm had breached its duties under a written trust agreement by failing to safeguard the blank forms. Kaiperm based its defense primarily upon the theory that the rules of the commercial code apply to fix liability between the parties. Under the code, when a negotiable instrument such as a check is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Garden Check Cashing Service, Inc. v. First National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Universal Premium Acceptance Corporation v. The York Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. U.S. Roofing, Inc. v. Credit Alliance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Helm Financial Corp. v. Iowa Northern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
  4. Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. Al Malaikah Auditorium Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Univ Premium v. York BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API