Legal Opinion
COSGROVE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 18, 2025No. 2:23-cv-04380Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PATRICK COSGROVE, : Plaintiff, : v. : CIVIL ACTION : NO. 23-4380 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER : CORPORATION doing business as : AMTRAK, : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s (“Defendant” or “Amtrak’’) Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is granted because Pennsylvania law does not permit Count V in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. I BACKGROUND Plaintiff Patrick Cosgrove worked as a Foreman for Amtrak since 2015. ECF No. 1 4 24 [hereinafter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- McTernan v. City of York, Penn.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Weaver v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.