Frost Railway Supply Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawkence, Judge:
Our jurisdiction has been invoked pursuant to the terms of section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1514) to determine the proper dutiable classification of an importation described on the consular invoice and entry papers as “Railroad Truck Spring Snubbers.” For brevity, they will be referred to infra as “snubbers.”
The importation was classified by the collector of customs as “Articles or wares not specially provided for, * * * if composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, * * * or other metal,” as described in paragraph 397 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1001,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. Henry L. Exstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Imperial Wall Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Birtwell v. SaltonstallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953