Legal Opinion

Payne v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1972No. 6188PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Associate Judge:

Immediately prior to trial, the trial court heard testimony, considered argument and then denied appellant’s motion to suppress a revolver which was the basis of the criminal charge against him of carrying a pistol without a license. D.C.Code 1967, § 22-3206. At that point in the proceedings, the following colloquy appears in the transcript in the record before us:

THE COURT: I deny your motion to suppress. Are we ready for trial ?

MR. DIER [Defense Counsel] : Your Honor, in this case Mr. Payne requests a trial by the Court at this time and I would stipulate the testimony…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Palmore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Fortune v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Little v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API