Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Wettstein

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 19, 1989No. C-3-85-550Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY CONCLUDING THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION AND OVERRULING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DOC. #8); FURTHER PROCEDURES ORDERED OF PLAINTIFF

RICE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) for Defendant’s failure to plead or otherwise defend against Plaintiff’s claim (Doc. # 8). The Plaintiff initially sought a Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. # 2), which the Court denied as prohibited by the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283 (Doc. # 3). In the Court’s Decision and Entry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Russell A. Firestone, III and Myrna Odell Firestone v. The Cleveland Trust Company and Russell A. Firestone, Jr., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. William H. Hernstadt v. Sharon S. HernstadtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Coons v. WilderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Walter J. Drewes, Cross-Appellant v. Brenda B. Ilnicki, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API