Legal Opinion

Overhead Door Corp. v. Nathanson

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 2363PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

McMILLAN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs manufacture and advertise overhead doors (such as garage doors which slide upward and along the ceiling of buildings). For many years Harry Nathanson, doing business as Overhead Door Co. of Charlotte, was the distributor in the Charlotte area for the products of the plaintiffs. At least as *962early as June 15, 1955 Nathanson as distributor made a written contract with one of the plaintiffs containing the essentials of the restrictive covenants which are the subject of this action.

About 1960 Nathanson incorporated his business, without…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Jewel Box Stores Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Beam v. . RutledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. U-Haul Company of North Carolina, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Thompson v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sunward Electronics, Inc. v. Keith L. McDonald Robert D. McDonald and Dog Guard Out-Of Site Fencing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Murphy Door Bed Co. v. Interior Sleep Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Murphy Door Bed Co., Inc. v. Interior Sleep Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API