Legal Opinion

Rafalsky v. Boehm

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 15, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from order directing defendant to furnish bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

The complaint is on a quemtum meruit for work done and materials furnished to defendant, at his request. The plaintiffs furnished a bill of particulars of their claim, and thereafter, and after service of the answer, moved for a bill of particulars of part of defendant’s defenses, which he was directed to furnish by the order from which this appeal is taken.

The appellant’s contention is that “ the answer is a general denial, and though the defendant has put his denial of performance in a somewhat more specific form than was necessary, the plaintiffs cannot avoid the obligation to furnish…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. MaybieNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strebell v. J. H. Rubber Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1893
  2. Bainbridge v. FriedlanderCity of New York Municipal Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API