Bainbridge v. Friedlander
City of New York Municipal Court
Appeal by defendants from order requiring them to furnish a bill of particulars of nonperformance by plaintiff of the contract he sues upon.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.
The plaintiff’s alleged cause is for services rendered by him under a special agreement as salesman for defendants, and his complaint alleges: “That plaintiff has duly performed all the terms and conditions of said agreement upon his part to be done and performed,” while the defendants by answer plead : “ The defendants deny that the plaintiff duly performed all the terms and conditions of said agreement upon his part to be done and performed, but, on the contrary, allege that plaintiff did not perform all the terms and conditions of said agreement, and neglected, failed and refused to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goddard v. Pardee Medicine Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
- Rafalsky v. BoehmCity of New York Municipal Court · 1892
- Strebell v. J. H. Rubber Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stanley v. BlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900