Legal Opinion
United States v. Annette Sandoval
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 27, 2011No. 10-1219, 10-1338, 10-1607PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
When most people think of fencing, the combat sport played with swords comes to mind. The defendants here, however, engaged in fencing of the criminal sort— namely, reselling high-end stolen goods to third parties at discounted prices. The defendants worked together to steal credit card information from retail establishments and fraudulently order merchandise that they then kept, resold, or returned for cash or merchandise credit. Their scheme unraveled in part because loss-prevention agents at stores such as Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue became suspicious of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Rebecca S. DemareeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. OmoleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Jeanette GrigsbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. WassonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Tajudeen RabiuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. David Garcia-UgarteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.