Legal Opinion

City of Centralia, Washington v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Pacific Power and Light Company, Respondent-Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1986No. 85-7082PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

In this challenge to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s disposition of two competing applications to develop a hydroelectric project at a dam, we review the policies developed by the Commission to reconcile its differing mandates under the Federal Power Act and the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended by the Energy Security Act of 1980. We affirm those policies under the two acts and affirm its disposition of the competing applications.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Statutory Framework

Congress enacted the Federal Power Act (FPA) to promote the “…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Udall v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of California, Ex Rel. State Water Resources Board v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Rock Creek Limited Partnership, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API