Legal Opinion
United States v. the Tug Terry E. Buchanan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
The United States has brought this action in rem against a tug and three barges which were under the control of the tug alleging that they violated Title 33 U.S.C.A. § 408, and Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, § 70.05-1. These statutes provide, inter alia, that it shall be unlawful to obstruct any navigational aid by fastening a vessel thereto. The libel alleges that the tug fastened these three barges to a navigational buoy placed in the entrance of Port Chester Harbor, and that before casting off, all four vessels were swinging from the buoy. It…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The "Margaret."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Cranberry Creek Coal Co. v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- New England Dredging Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
- United States v. the Republic No. 2District Court, S.D. Texas · 1946
- The ColomboCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Ohio Valley Company, Inc., in Personam, and M/v John Fitzgerald, Her Engines, Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc., in RemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Com. of Puerto Rico v. SS Zoe ColocotroniDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1978
- United States v. Tug Colette MalloyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- In Re the Complaint of Midland Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1968
- United States v. THE M/V MARTINDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.