William M. Lloyd & Co. v. Poythress
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, J., concurs in result; WALKER J., dissents; CLARK, C. J., concurs in the dissenting opinion. Defendant objected to the introduction of the account and affidavit chiefly upon the ground that the affiant, (182) being treasurer of the plaintiff corporation was disqualified to testify to the matters stated in the affidavit under C.S. 1795. In an action brought by a corporation against the executor or administrator of a deceased person, it has been held with us that an officer and stockholder of the plaintiff corporation is debarred from giving evidence of personal transactions or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Cecil v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- C. H. Albers Commission Co. v. SesselIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Morehead Banking Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Nall v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Hunt v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. CumberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Endicott-Johnson Corp. v. . SchochetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930