Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants Virgil Dykes and Connie Dykes d/b/a Dykes Farms challenge an adverse grant of summary judgment on their claims against respondent Sukup Manufacturing Company (Sukup). Appellants contend that the district court erred by concluding that a 2003 settlement agreement between appellants and third-party defendant, respondent Superior, Inc. (Superior), released Sukup from liability on claims brought by appellants against Sukup.
FACTS
Appellants are farmers residing in Wa-basha County, Minnesota. Sukup manufactures farm equipment and machinery including a pneumatic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Specialized Tours, Inc. v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Gronquist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Anderson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010