Legal Opinion

Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 2009No. A08-0583PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellants Virgil Dykes and Connie Dykes d/b/a Dykes Farms challenge an adverse grant of summary judgment on their claims against respondent Sukup Manufacturing Company (Sukup). Appellants contend that the district court erred by concluding that a 2003 settlement agreement between appellants and third-party defendant, respondent Superior, Inc. (Superior), released Sukup from liability on claims brought by appellants against Sukup.

FACTS

Appellants are farmers residing in Wa-basha County, Minnesota. Sukup manufactures farm equipment and machinery including a pneumatic…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Specialized Tours, Inc. v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Gronquist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Anderson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API