Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Unocal Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 2009No. 09CA0610PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge WEBB.
This land damages class action arises from the release of asbestos during removal of an underground oil pipeline previously owned by defendants, Unocal Corporation, Unocal Pipeline Company, and Union Oil Company of California (collectively Unocal). We granted Unocal's petition under C.R.C.P. 23(f) and section 18-20-901, C.R.8.2008, for interlocutory review of the trial court's order certifying two classes represented by named plaintiffs, Richard and Mary Jackson, Robert and Deborah Hradecky, Thomas Fehringer, Dean Lousberg, and the Lousberg Partnership.
We conclude that…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. Catlin Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Garcia v. Medved Chevrolet, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Patterson v. BP America Production Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Reyher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Contreras v. KeyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.