Legal Opinion

Croxton v. Truesdel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 29, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition in original jurisdiction of this Court for injunction by W. L. Croxton. J. W. Truesdel el al. against Henry Truesdel, John McGaskill el al.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

By this proceeding in the original jurisdiction of this Court the petitioners ask that the board of control of Kershaw County be enjoined from establishing a dispensary in the town of Kershaw. The order of injunction was made immediately after the hearing and we now state briefly the ground upon which it rests. The answer denies some of the allegations of the petition, but there is no controversy about those facts on which we think the issue depends.

The town of Kershaw, chartered as “the town of Kershaw, in the county of Lancaster,”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Luman v. Hitchens Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Wilcox v. PaddockMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. State v. BradtTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. SpragueNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. George Jonas Glass Co. v. RossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turner v. LewieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Harrell v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  3. Phillips v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Rawl v. McCownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  5. McKerall v. Road & Highway CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API