Helman v. Withers
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
New, J. —
This was an action in replevin, instituted and tried in a justice’s court, and from there appealed to and tried in the circuit court.
The appellee, in his complaint, avers that he is the owner and entitled to the possession of one bald-face mare, of the value of sixty-five dollars; that the appellants, Tobias K. Helman and Samuel E. Helman, the defendants below, have1 the possession without right, and unlawfully detain the same from the appellee; and that the said property has not been taken by virtue of any execution, tax assessment, attachment, or other writ of any kind against the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nichols v. . MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Bullis v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Mills v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Manning, Bowman Co. v. . KeenanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Freeman v. ScurlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lou Leventhal Auto Co., Inc. v. MunnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Andrews v. HoeslichWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Black v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- West v. GraffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Johnson v. Minneapolis Business CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.