Legal Opinion

Washburn v. City of Berkeley

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1987No. A031364PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

Andrea Washburn and others (plaintiffs) filed a petition for writ of mandate against the City of Berkeley (City) and others pursuant to Elections Code section 5025, challenging as false and misleading a ballot argument submitted in support of a local initiative measure. Following entry of a stipulated judgment, plaintiffs were awarded attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 from real party in interest Anna Rabkin (Rabkin). Rabkin attacks the fee award on several grounds. She argues: (1) plaintiffs waived any claim to attorney fees; (2) plaintiffs do not…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Weeks v. Baker & McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Friends of the Trails v. BlasiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API