Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Mackay

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1964No. ABA 8Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Neil S. Mackay, respondent in the above entitled disciplinary proceeding wherein he was disbarred from the practice of law by this court, has petitioned for a rehearing on nine separate grounds. The respondent’s brief does not deal with these grounds in any detail and ignores some of them entirely. However, we shall discuss the six grounds which we deem to have sufficient merit to warrant our consideration. These are set forth in the margin, in paraphrase but under the numbers used by the respondent.1 We shall commence with grounds numbered one, five and seven; and,…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API