Legal Opinion

Huntington v. United States Department of Commerce

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 21, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-2249PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E.'BOASBERG, United States District Judge

An attorney in the field, Plaintiff R. Danny Huntington seeks information about a defunct confidential program of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which is housed in the Department of Commerce. This program - the Sensitive Application Warning System (SAWS)— was used to flag certain patent applications as involving particularly sensitive subject matter. To gain insight into the SAWS Program, Plaintiff filed multiple Freedom of Information Act requests with Commerce and subsequently brought this suit. After a previous round…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Huntington v. U.S. Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API