Legal Opinion
Seybolt v. Baber
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 2, 1953No. [No. 173, October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
This action in assumpsit was brought in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County by James M. Seybolt and Vernon D. George, trading as Seybolt & George, against Fred G. Baber and Mary Baber, his wife, to recover $487.55 upon an oral contract to survey a small piece of ground at the rear end of a lot situated at the intersection of Meem and Diamond Avenues in Gaithersburg.
The defendants filed general issue pleas. Mrs. Baber also filed an affidavit in defense of the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. She alleged in her affidavit that before the plaintiffs started the work they agreed that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Appel v. HupfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Goodwin v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Higby v. HooperMontana Supreme Court · 1950
- Strohecker v. Schumacher & Seiler, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Butler v. Reed-Avery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Gore v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Olberding Const. Co., Inc. v. RudenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.