Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Soucie

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 18, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02006Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ANTHONY D. DORSEY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 25-2006-JAR-BGS CITY OF SHAWNEE, KANSAS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Anthony Dorsey brings a claim for malicious prosecution under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against the City of Shawnee, Kansas and Officers Blair Whaley, FNU Soucie, and Sergeant Josh Bayless (“the Officers”). After denial of their motion to dismiss,1 the Officers filed a Motion for Certification for Interlocutory Appeal and Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (Doc. 21), seeking to appeal the qualified-immunity…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
Elder v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
Cortez v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.