Legal Opinion

Lee v. Diamond

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1937No. 1 Div. 935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Tort action brought by appellee plaintiff, against the appellant and one C. "M. Farrell, the latter doing business as Ten Cent Dime Taxi Service, to recover damages for alleged personal injuries.

The complaint, as originally filed, consisted of four counts, two charging simple negligence, and the other two charging a wanton wrong.

In each of the counts, the negligent or wrongful act, resulting in the injury of the plaintiff, is charged directly to the defendant Lawrence Lee, and liability is sought to be fastened upon the defendant C. M. Farrell upon the doctrine of respond-eat…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Powell v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Downes v. NorrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Ivey v. WigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API