National Labor Relations Board v. Strong
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Douglas
There is a surface logic in what the Court does today: If the Board may award back pay (which is computed from the collective bargaining agreement), it should be allowed to award fringe benefits, whose character and amount are also determined by the collective bargaining agreement. An award of back pay, however, is an express part of the legislative grant of authority,1 while the *363award of fringe benefits is not. That is, of course, not a complete answer, for Congress did not make an exhaustive catalogue of devices used to thwart the Act, but largely left to the Board “the relation of remedy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.