Legal Opinion
Gaynor. v. OB/GYN Specialists, Ltd.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided May 28, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-0023-HPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MICHAEL, Senior District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is this day
ADJUDGED AND ORDERED as follows:(1) The 22 April 1999 Report and Ree- ■ ommendation of the Magistrate Judge shall be, and it hereby is, adopted in its entirety and defendants’ 15 March 1999 motion for summary judgment shall be, and it hereby is, denied.(2) The 3 May 1999 objection by defendants to the Magistrate Judge’s report shall be, and it hereby is, overruled.(3) The 17 May 1999 request for Rule 11 sanctions by plaintiff shall be, and it hereby is, denied.
The Clerk of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Quintin Orpiano v. Gene M. Johnson, Warden W. P. Rodgers, Asst. Warden (Security) R. A. Clendenen Correctional CorporalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Russell T. Fitzgerald v. Preston C. Manning, Jr., M. D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Raines v. LutzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SMD Software, Inc. v. Emove, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Seisinger v. SiebelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Blackjewel, L.L.C. v. United BankUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2022