Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. M. K.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 10, 2017No. 15JU04275; A163188 (Control); 15JU04276; A163189PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

In this consolidated juvenile dependency case,1 mother appeals the juvenile court’s permanency judgments that changed the permanency plan for her children from reunification to guardianship with the paternal grandparents. Mother argues that the juvenile court erred in concluding that, despite the Department of Human Services’ (DHS) reasonable efforts to effect reunification, mother had not made sufficient progress for the children to safely return home. We conclude that the record contains sufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s conclusions and, accordingly, affirm.

The parties do…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. M. K.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Department of Human Services v. S. M. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Department of Human Services v. G. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Department of Human Services v. C. L. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Department of Human Services v. T. M. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dept. of Human Services v. C. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Dept. of Human Services v. D. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. M. G. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. C. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Dept. of Human Services v. M. E. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API