Legal Opinion

In Re International Chemical Workers Union and Public Citizen Health Research Group

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 9, 1987No. 87-1281PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The International Chemical Workers Union and Public Citizen Health Research Group (“Petitioners”) have petitioned the court for a writ of mandamus. Petitioners seek to compel the Secretary of Labor and the Assistant Secretary for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“agency” or “OSHA”) to take emergency action to protect workers from the deleterious effects of exposure to cadmium. We have treated the petition for a writ of mandamus as a petition for review of OSHA’s final decision not to issue an emergency temporary standard (“ETS”) for cadmium. Following a thorough review of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. In Re Telecommunications Research and Action CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Thorne G. Auchter, Assistant Secretary, Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Florida Peach Growers Ass'n v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Public Citizen Health Research Group v. AuchterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re International Chemical Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  2. BST Holdings, L.L.C. v. OSHACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  3. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, Uaw v. Elaine ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API