Legal Opinion
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Chao
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 22, 2004No. 03-4146PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
On December 9, 1993, the International Union of United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”) petitioned the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) to take “immediate action to protect workers from the health effects of occupational exposure to machining fluids[J” UAW urged OSHA to promul*251gate a rule that would establish a standard for occupational exposure to machining, or metalworking, fluids (“MWFs”). OSHA did not formally respond to UAW’s petition for rulemaking until more than a decade later when,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- American Horse Protection Association, Inc. v. Richard E. Lyng, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Henry Geller v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Thorne G. Auchter, Assistant Secretary, Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- National Congress of Hispanic American Citizens (El Congreso) v. Ray Marshall, Secretary of United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, Uaw v. Elaine ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004