Legal Opinion
Yim Tong Chung v. Smith
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 31, 1986No. 84 Civ. 3125 (JES)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
FACTS
The fifteen plaintiffs in this action are natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) who are currently in this country. Each plaintiff had apparently 1 received a passport from PRC authorities 2 and then applied for and received a non-immigrant visa from United States (“U.S.”) consular officials in China. See Affidavit of Christine Petersen (“Petersen Aff.”) at HU 2-3, 11-22, & Ex. A. Thirteen of the plaintiffs applied for and obtained tourist visas, 3 and the other two applied for and obtained non-immigrant student visas. 4…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Public Affairs Associates, Inc. v. RickoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.