Legal Opinion

Dillinger v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1927No. 7551PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction and continuing the same in force. The injunction restrained appellant, hereafter called plaintiff, from proceeding to trial or taking further steps in an action at law pending in the state circuit court of Sullivan county, Missouri, which action was brought by plaintiff against the ap-pellee, hereafter called defendant railway company, and six individual defendants. The short faets leading up to the order appealed from are substantially as follows:

February 11, 1924, plaintiff brought the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Dietzsch v. HuidekoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Ex Parte NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Polyplastics, Inc. v. Transconex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. WertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Cray, McFawn & Co. v. Hegarty, Conroy & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Wabash Ry. Co. v. LindleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. v. Stude Stude v. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. Stude v. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API