Legal Opinion

Hale v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, TOWN OF BLACKSBURG

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 27, 2009No. Record 081000.; Record 081001PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR.

In these consolidated appeals, the principal issue we consider is whether the circuit court correctly applied Code § 15.2-2307 in finding that the owner/developers of a parcel of real property obtained a vested right to a particular use of the property under a rezoning ordinance subject to their proffers and, thus, are not subject to a subsequent amendment to the locality's zoning ordinance that placed a limitation on that use. We also consider whether Code § 15.2-2298(B) would bar the locality from enforcing the amendment of the zoning ordinance…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dorman Hartley v. Dillard's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Alliance v. Com., Dept. of Environ. QualitySupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Board of Supervisors v. BOARD OF ZONINGSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Natrella v. Arlington Cty. Bd. of Zoning App.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  5. Young v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arogas v. Frederick Bd. of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  2. Winborne v. Virginia LotterySupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  3. Sup'rs of Stafford County v. Crucible, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Shilling v. BakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  5. W & W Partnership v. Prince William BzaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API